Fakings Ellas Tambien Caen Y Si Tienen Novio Peor La Misma -

Intuitively, you’d think a woman in a relationship would be less likely to fall for faking. She already has a partner. She has routines, shared history, and perhaps even love. So why is she more vulnerable?

At first glance, this popular phrase from certain corners of social media and street-level psychology sounds cynical. It suggests that deception—particularly emotional or romantic deception—is a universal trap. Men fake interest, status, or commitment; women fall for it. But the second half of the sentence is the real dagger: "and if they have a boyfriend, it's even worse." fakings ellas tambien caen y si tienen novio peor la misma

If the boyfriend is distant, the fake suitor fakes closeness. If the boyfriend is broke, the fake suitor fakes wealth. If the boyfriend is predictable, the fake suitor fakes spontaneity. Intuitively, you’d think a woman in a relationship

The faker knows this. He doesn’t need to win her completely right away—just enough to create doubt, excitement, and secrecy. Neurochemically, novel stimuli release dopamine. A long-term boyfriend becomes familiar, reducing dopamine spikes. The new man—even if fake—activates reward circuits. The boyfriend’s real text says "What do you want for dinner?" The faker’s text says "I can’t stop thinking about you." So why is she more vulnerable

Because the boyfriend is real—with real flaws—the fake version of perfection shines brighter. Paradoxically, having a boyfriend creates a psychological safety net. A woman might think: "I’m just having fun. I won’t fall for him because I already have a partner." That false security lowers her guard. She engages with the faker under the illusion of control, only to find herself emotionally hooked.

Why would having a partner make someone more vulnerable to being deceived, not less?